The fact that discourse in international reporting matches with the foreign policy of the base state is an important problem in terms of the objectivity of the report. In this context, this study examines the discourse of AP and TASS, which are the leading news agencies of two major actor states in Syria crisis; United States of America and Russian Federation, regarding their news articles released on the Operation: Euphrates Shield, the campaign launched by Turkey in the Syrian border, within the scope of whether the news articles are coordinative with the foreign policy of the states. This study is made through a critical approach focusing on the texts of the reports that is Van Dijk’s “Discourse Analysis”. The result of the study indicates that although AP is an independent news agency while TASS is state–run news agency, in regard to the relation of international agency news and ideology, considering the Operation: Euphrates Shield, both agencies released reports based on their own states’ national interests and the perspective of those states’ foreign policy