The political discourse on Kurdish identity in Turkey has been shaped by a series of definitions that hide or deny the historical and socio-political nature of the issue, along with a number of missing parts. A substitute dimension of this lacking definition is the discourse of "brotherhood" and "religious brotherhood". The current study argues that the brotherhood and religious fellowship motif of Islamist conservative politics is the main integrating argument of the political discourse towards Kurdish identity and functions as the only way for fusing this identity with the national political structure. In this regard, the study aims to examine the fellowship discourse intending to be inclusive in socio-political and cultural areas in terms of Kurdish issue based on the JDP's motifs of brotherhood and religious fellowship. In the study using the critical discourse analysis method, it was determined that the integrative discourse strategy of conservative politics has a function that homogenizes difference and ethnic diversity by pushing it to the second plan, and thus, it seeks to produce consent.